The innate endowment for language: Underspecified or overspecified?

In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modularity in Language and Theory of Mind.Michael Siegal & Luca Surian - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand. pp. 2--133.
Modularity in language and theory of mind: What is the evidence?Michael Siegal & Luca Surian - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Distinctively human thinking: Modular precursors and components.Peter Carruthers - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand. pp. 69--88.
Ignorance of Language.Michael Devitt - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Modularity and.H. Clark Barrett - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand. pp. 2--199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#340,684)

6 months
52 (#97,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Conventions and Their Role in Language.M. J. Cain - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):137-158.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references