How to Kill with a Ballpoint: Credibility in Dutch Forensic Science

Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (1):52-75 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A woman is found lying dead on the floor of the living room of her house in Leiden, the Netherlands, and because of a swollen and a slightly wounded eyelid, an autopsy is performed on the body the day after it is found. Behind the wound, there is a whole ballpoint pen, which entered the head of the deceased through her right eye causing mortal brain damage. How did it get there? This question was to cause a stir in Dutch society, holding a group of police detectives and several scientists in its grip for several years. In this article, the ballpoint case is analyzed as to the boundary work between credible and noncredible expertise. As it is often assumed that boundary work in continental law is preempted by the structure of these law models, this case study adds a comparative note to the growing literature about science and the law.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of science in the netherlands.James W. McAllister - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):191 – 204.
Forensic science 2020 – the end of the crossroads?Claude Roux, Olivier Ribaux & Frank Crispino - 2018 - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 50 (6):607-618.
Democratizing Science: Various Routes and Visions of Dutch Science Shops.Joseph Wachelder - 2003 - Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (2):244-273.
Forensic culture as epistemic culture: The sociology of forensic science.Simon A. Cole - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):36-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
7 (#1,201,537)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?