Philosophy 75 (2):245-263 (2000)

Authors
Dirk Baltzly
University of Tasmania
Abstract
It is sometimes claimed that the Kantian Ought Implies Can principle (OIC) rules out the possibility of moral dilemmas. A certain understanding of OIC does rule out the possibility of moral dilemmas in the sense defined. However I doubt that this particular formulation of the OIC principle is one that fits well with the eudaimonist framework common to ancient Greek moral philosophy. In what follows, I explore the reasons why Aristotle would not accept the OIC principle in the form in which it rules out the possibility of moral dilemmas.
Keywords Nussbaum  Hart  Aeschylus Agamemnon
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0031819100000279
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

I Ought, Therefore I Can.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167-216.
Blaming Agents in Moral Dilemmas.Byron Williston - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):563-576.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
74 ( #141,189 of 2,439,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,984 of 2,439,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes