Oxford University Press (1998)

Authors
Mark Balaguer
California State University, Los Angeles
Abstract
In this book, Balaguer demonstrates that there are no good arguments for or against mathematical platonism. He does this by establishing that both platonism and anti-platonism are defensible views. Introducing a form of platonism ("full-blooded platonism") that solves all problems traditionally associated with the view, he proceeds to defend anti-platonism (in particular, mathematical fictionalism) against various attacks, most notably the Quine-Putnam indispensability attack. He concludes by arguing that it is not simply that we do not currently have any good argument for or against platonism, but that we could never have such an argument and, indeed, that there is no fact of the matter as to whether platonism is correct.
Keywords Mathematics Philosophy  Platonists
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2001
Buy the book $20.98 used (64% off)   $21.00 new (64% off)    Amazon page
Call number QA8.4.B345 1998
ISBN(s) 0195143981   9780195143980   9780195122305
DOI 10.2307/3071098
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,047
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abstract Expressionism and the Communication Problem.David Liggins - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):599-620.
The Reliability Challenge and the Epistemology of Logic.Joshua Schechter - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):437-464.

View all 106 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Supervenience and Necessity: A Response to Balaguer.J. M. Dieterle - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
Platonism and Anti‐Platonism: Why Worry?Mary Leng - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
Review of M. Balaguer, Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics[REVIEW]Jm Dieterle - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):775-780.
The Nature of Mathematical Objects.Øystein Linnebo - 2008 - In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. pp. 205--219.
Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism?Greg Restall - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
219 ( #37,859 of 2,344,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #239,607 of 2,344,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes