Relativistic objects

Noûs 33 (4):644-662 (1999)
I offer an argument in defense of four-dimensionalism, the view that objects are temporally, as well as spatially extended. The argument is of the inference-to-the-best-explanation variety and is based on relativistic considerations. It deals with the situation in which one and the same object has different three-dimensional shapes at the same time and proceeds by asking what sort of thing it must be in order to present itself in such different ways in various "perspectives" (associated with moving reference frames) without being different from itself. I argue that the best answer is that the object must be four-dimensional. It will then have differing 3D shapes in different perspectives because such shapes are intrinsic properties of its 3D parts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00198
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,195
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Relativistic Persistence.Ian Gibson & Oliver Pooley - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):157–198.
Persistence and Location in Relativistic Spacetime.Cody Gilmore - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1224-1254.
The Donkey Problem.Mark Heller - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):83-101.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

34 ( #150,322 of 2,163,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #129,103 of 2,163,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums