Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (10):641-645 (2020)

Authors
Vikki Entwistle
University of Aberdeen
Wendy A. Rogers
Macquarie University
Abstract
Throughout March and April 2020, debate raged about how best to allocate limited intensive care unit resources in the face of a growing COVID-19 pandemic. The debate was dominated by utility-based arguments for saving the most lives or life-years. These arguments were tempered by equity-based concerns that triage based solely on prognosis would exacerbate existing health inequities, leaving disadvantaged patients worse off. Central to this debate was the assumption that ICU admission is a valuable but scarce resource in the pandemic context.In this paper, we argue that the concern about achieving equity in ICU triage is problematic for two reasons. First, ICU can be futile and prolong or exacerbate suffering rather than ameliorate it. This may be especially true in patients with COVID-19 with emerging data showing that most who receive access to a ventilator will still die. There is no value in admitting patients with poor prognostic indicators to ICU to meet an equity target when intensive critical care is contrary to their best interests. Second, the focus on ICU admission shifts focus away from important aspects of COVID-19 care where there is greater opportunity for mitigating suffering and enhancing equitable care.We propose that the focus on equity concerns during the pandemic should broaden to include providing all people who need it with access to the highest possible standard of end-of-life care. This requires attention to culturally safe care in the following interlinked areas: palliative care, communication and decision support and advanced care planning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106460
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

COVID-19 and Justice.John McMillan - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (10):639-640.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Relational Ethical Approaches to the COVID-19 Pandemic.David Ian Jeffrey - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):495-498.
COVID-19 and Healthcare Professionals: The Principle of the Common Good.Randy A. Tudy - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (4):170-174.
Impacts of COVID19 Pandemic on Care of the Patients with Cancer.Esra Bilir - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):111-113.
Vertical Equity in Health Care Resource Allocation.Gavin Mooney - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (3):203-215.
Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in The Netherlands.H. T. Have & H. Keasberry - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-23

Total views
15 ( #701,238 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes