Replies to McKenna, Pereboom, and Kane

Philosophical Studies (1):1-22 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to respond to critiques of my recent book (Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem) put forward by Michael McKenna, Derk Pereboom, and Bob Kane in an Author-Meets-Critics session at the 2011 Pacific Division meeting of the APA.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,960

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisionism about free will: a statement & defense.Manuel Vargas - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):45-62.
Response to Kane, Fischer, and Pereboom.Manuel Vargas - 2007 - In John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom & Manuel Vargas (eds.), Four Views on Free Will. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Essays on free will and moral responsibility.Nick Trakakis & Daniel Cohen (eds.) - 2008 - Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-25

Downloads
123 (#178,207)

6 months
2 (#1,700,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Balaguer
California State University, Los Angeles

References found in this work

Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry Frankfurt - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
What Happens When Someone Acts?J. David Velleman - 1992 - Mind 101 (403):461-481.
Causal Asymmetries.Daniel M. Hausman - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references