Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)

Authors
Dirk Baltzly
University of Tasmania
Abstract
Stoicism was one of the new philosophical movements of the Hellenistic period. The name derives from the porch (stoa poikilê) in the Agora at Athens decorated with mural paintings, where the members of the school congregated, and their lectures were held. Unlike ‘epicurean,’ the sense of the English adjective ‘stoical’ is not utterly misleading with regard to its philosophical origins. The Stoics did, in fact, hold that emotions like fear or envy (or impassioned sexual attachments, or passionate love of anything whatsoever) either were, or arose from, false judgements and that the sage—a person who had attained moral and intellectual perfection—would not undergo them. The later Stoics of Roman Imperial times, Seneca and Epictetus, emphasise the doctrines (already central to the early Stoics' teachings) that the sage is utterly immune to misfortune and that virtue is sufficient for happiness. Our phrase ‘stoic calm’ perhaps encapsulates the general drift of these claims. It does not, however, hint at the even more radical ethical views which the Stoics defended, e.g. that only the sage is free while all others are slaves, or that all those who are morally vicious are equally so. Though it seems clear that some Stoics took a kind of perverse joy in advocating views which seem so at odds with common sense, they did not do so simply to shock. Stoic ethics achieves a certain plausibility within the context of their physical theory and psychology, and within the framework of Greek ethical theory as that was handed down to them from Plato and Aristotle. It seems that they were well aware of the mutually interdependent nature of their philosophical views, likening philosophy itself to a living animal in which logic is bones and sinews; ethics and physics, the flesh and the soul respectively (another version reverses this assignment, making ethics the..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
The Therapy of Desire.Martha Nussbaum - 1994 - Princeton University Press.
The Stoics.John M. Rist (ed.) - 2021 - University of California Press.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Intuitionism and Disagreement.Brian Besong - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2767-2789.
On Being Attached.Monique Wonderly - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):223-242.
Free Will and the Bounds of the Self.Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols - 2011 - In Robert Kane (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
A Moral Reason to Be a Mere Theist: Improving the Practical Argument.Xiaofei Liu - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2):113-132.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

H. Richard Niebuhr and Stoicism.Richard E. Crouter - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):129 - 146.
Stoic Realpolitik.Firmin DeBranander - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):277-292.
Stoicism & Emotion.Margaret R. Graver - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
A New Stoic: The Wise Patient.William E. Stempsey - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):451 – 472.
Stoic Ethics.William O. Stephens - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
262 ( #29,794 of 2,349,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #26,095 of 2,349,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes