Apeiron 29 (4):121-142 (1996)
In the Phaedo, Socrates endorses the view that the senses are not a means whereby we may come to gain knowledge. Whenever one investigates by means of the senses, one is deceived. One can attain truth only by inquiry through intellect alone. It is a measure of the success of empiricism that modern commentators take a very different approach to Phaedo 65a9-67b3 than their neoplatonist forebearers did. In what follows I shall argue that, if they made too much of "Socrate's" anti-empiricism, we make too little of it.I believe that careful examination of the presuppositions of Socratic questioning will reveal some principled reasons which lead to the view about sense perception that Socrates endorses in the Phaedo. These reasons are, I believe, wrong and I think that Plato may have had occassion to reconsider them later in his career. But even if this is so, it remains that Socrates' anti-empiricism in this dialogue is not simply a gratuitous epistemological reflection of the dialogue's otherworldly, ascetic ethical outlook
|Keywords||Plato Forms Epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Perceiving Particulars and Recollecting the Forms in the 'Phaedo'.Catherine Osborne - 1994 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:211 - 233.
Review. Plato, Phaedo. CJ Rowe. Socratic Rationalism and Political Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plato's Phaedo.R. Rutherford - 1997 - The Classical Review 47 (2):274-277.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads21 ( #236,978 of 2,169,384 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,214 of 2,169,384 )
How can I increase my downloads?