- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States
Isis 109 (3):538-558 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Alternatives to review by peers: A contribution to the theory of scientific choice. [REVIEW]Rustum Roy - 1984 - Minerva 22 (3-4):316-328.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Froebel and the Rise of Educational Theory in the United States.Meika Sophia Baader - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (5):427-444.
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research.Rajat Bhattacharya & Lee M. Ellis - 2018 - Bioessays 40 (1):1700185.
Peer-review and patents: Why the goose that lays the golden egg is a red Herring.Sivaramjani Thambisetty & Kartik Kumaramangalam - unknown
A Prehistory of Peer Review: Religious Blueprints from the Hartlib Circle.Brent Tibor Ranalli - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):12-18.
The Challenge Posed by Autonomy in Medical Ethics.James Alan Branch - 2000 - Dissertation, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
Who legislates the truth? Science, organizational governance, and democratic decision making.A. Brennan & J. Malpas - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (1):79-97.
Religious Education in Liberal Democratic Societies: The Question of Accountability and Autonomy.Walter Feinberg - 2003 - In Kevin McDonough & Walter Feinberg (eds.), Citizenship and Education in Liberal-Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities. Oxford University Press.
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-09-20
Downloads
31 (#504,675)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
2018-09-20
Downloads
31 (#504,675)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine.Jamie Shaw - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-27.
Empowering the Research Community to Investigate Misconduct and Promote Research Integrity and Ethics: New Regulation in Scandinavia.Knut Jørgen Vie - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (6):1-19.
Turning tradition into an instrument of research: The editorship of William Nicholson.Anna Gielas - 2020 - Centaurus 62 (1):38-53.
The Ethics and Politics of Academic Knowledge Production: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics.Gibson Burrell, Michael R. Hyman, Christopher Michaelson, Julie A. Nelson, Scott Taylor & Andrew West - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 180 (3):917-940.
Introduction: Editorship and the editing of scientific journals, 1750–1950.Aileen Fyfe & Anna Gielas - 2020 - Centaurus 62 (1):5-20.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo