Spinoza's Three Gods and the Modes of Communication

European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):26-49 (2012)
Etienne Balibar
Kingston University
The paper, which retains a hypothetical character, argues that Spinoza's propositions referring to God (or involving the use of the name ‘God’, essentially in the Ethics), can be read in a fruitful manner apart from any pre-established hypothesis concerning his own ‘theological preferences’, as definite descriptions of three ‘ideas of God’ which have the same logical status: one (akin to Jewish Monotheism) which identifies the idea of God with the idea of the Law, one (akin to a heretic ‘Socinian’ version of Christianity) which identifies it with the idea of Human Love, and one (akin to a form of Cosmotheism, rather than ‘Pantheism’) which identifies it with Nature. Evidence of this analytic tripartition can be found in the letter of the texts themselves. If accepted (at least as a thought experiment), it would carry three interesting consequences: 1) to renew our understanding of the theory of the ‘three kinds of knowledge’, which have obvious affinities with the three possible ways of understanding the idea of God; 2) to emphasize the critical move associated by Spinoza with each of the three ideas of God (passing from an anthropomorphic legislator to an impersonal command, passing from an imaginary community of similarities to a practical community of singularities, and passing from a teleological and harmonious idea of nature to a causal, even conflictual, idea of its infinite power); 3) to locate the essential ethical and political questions associated with religion on the ‘vectors’ which lead from one idea to another, and represent themselves practical conatus: obedience, utility, order. It is also assumed that such a reading enhances the relevance of Spinoza's philosophy with respect to contemporary debates about religion and secularism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00511.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,938
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Spinoza and Ecology.Arne Naess - 1977 - Philosophia 7 (1):45-54.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Profanation in Spinoza and Badiou: Religion and Truth.Bülent Diken - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (3):27-50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Spinoza on the Essence, Mutability and Power of God.Nicholas Okrent - 1998 - Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):71-84.
Spinoza's Model of Human Nature.Andrew Youpa - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 61-76.
Spinoza and Prime Matter.Charles Huenemann - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):21-32.
Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Laerke - 2011 - Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Spinoza.Michael Della Rocca - 2008 - Routledge.
Begriffliche Und Psychologische Ordnung Bei Spinoza.Dominik Perler - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):188-215.
Spinoza and the Self-Overcoming of Solipsism.Brook Ziporyn - 2012 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):125 - 140.
Maimonides' God and Spinoza's.Carlos Fraenkel - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2).
Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
45 ( #138,606 of 2,273,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #376,894 of 2,273,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature