The Belief in Reality and the Reality of Belief

Giornale di Metafisica 17 (1-2):71-85 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ontological arguments (OA) discussion is about the relations between essence and existence, and between analytic and synthetic judgments. Rationalists asserts that essence determines existence. Empiricists assert that existence cannot be deduced from thought. However, both made the error of disconnecting the objective existence of God from subjective thought about Him. We propose to demonstrate two interconnected theses: A) In the course of its historical development, the OA did not manage to refute empiricist critiques. B) His existence is only partial, since a full existence needs two sources; an idea and a sense-datum.(edited)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
47 (#251,014)

6 months
4 (#183,357)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oded Balaban
University of Haifa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Les Méditations Métaphysiques.René Descartes & Florence Khodoss - 1956 - Presses Universitaires de France.
Where Does the Ontological Argument Go Wrong?Patrick J. McGrath - 1984 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 30:144-164.
Where Does the Ontological Argument Go Wrong?Patrick J. McGrath - 1984 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 30:144-164.

Add more references