Authors
Philipp Balzer
University of Zürich
Peter Schaber
University of Zürich
Abstract
The 1992 incorporation of an article by referendum in the SwissConstitution mandating that the federal government issue regulations onthe use of genetic material that take into account the dignity ofnonhuman organism raises philosophical questions about how we shouldunderstand what is meant by ``the dignity of nonhuman animals,'' andabout what sort of moral demands arise from recognizing this dignitywith respect to their genetic engineering. The first step in determiningwhat is meant is to clarify the difference between dignity when appliedto humans and when applied to nonhumans. Several conceptions of humandignity should be rejected in favor of a fourth conception: the rightnot to be degraded. This right implies that those who have it have thecognitive capacities that are prerequisite for self-respect. In the caseof nonhuman organisms that lack this capacity, respecting their dignityrequires the recognition that their inherent value, which is tied totheir abilities to pursue their own good, be respected. This value isnot absolute, as it is in the case of humans, so it does not prohibitbreeding manipulations that make organisms more useful to humans. But itdoes restrict morally how sentient animals can be used. In regard togenetic engineering, this conception requires that animals be allowedthe uninhibited development of species specific functions, a positionshared by Holland and Attfield, as opposed to the Original Purposeconception proposed by Fox and the Integrity of the Genetic Make-upposition proposed by Rolston. The inherent value conception of dignity,as here defended, is what is meant in the Swiss Constitution article
Keywords dignity  Swiss Constitution  nonhuman inherent value  genetic engineering
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009536230634
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785/2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals.Rob De Vries - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):469-493.
The Good Life of Creatures with Dignity Some Comments on the Swiss Expert Opinion.Frans W. A. Brom - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):53-63.
Human Dignity and the Dignity of Creatures.Dunja Jaber - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):29-42.
Persons, Human Beings, and Respect.Peter Baumann - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):5-17.
Genetic Engineering and the Moral Status of Non-Human Species.Anders Melin - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):479-495.
Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering.Martin Gunderson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):87-102.
Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans.Thomas De Koninck - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):17-25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
185 ( #52,471 of 2,421,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,026 of 2,421,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes