Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):1 - 24 (2002)
AbstractKant's claim that modality is a 'category' provides an approach to modality to be contrasted with Lewis's reductive analysis. Lewis's position is unsatisfactory, since it depends on an inherently modal conception of a world. This suggests that modality is 'primitive'; and the Kantian position is a prima facie plausible position of this kind, which is filled out by considering the relationship between modality and inference. This provides a context for comparing the Kantian position with Wright's non-cognitivist 'conventionalism'. Wright's position is vulnerable to the type of argument used against ethical non-cognitivism, and the Kantian position is further confirmed by Blackburn's acknowledgment that modality is 'antinaturalistic to its core'. The position is further elaborated to show that it can accommodate the famous Kripkean categories of the empirically necessary and the contingent a priori, and finally defended against the criticisms used by Quine against Carnap.
Similar books and articles
The inaugural address: Kantian modality: Tom Baldwin.Tom Baldwin - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):1–24.
Modality and Empirical Thinking. A Critical Discussion of the Kantian Theory of Modality.Veit Pittioni - 1987 - Philosophy and History 20 (2):122-123.
Why Lewis's analysis of modality succeeds in its reductive ambitions.Ross P. Cameron - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology.Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Concrete possible worlds and counterfactual conditionals: Lewis versus Williamson on modal knowledge.Andrea Sauchelli - 2010 - Synthese 176 (3):345-359.
A naturalistic interpretation of the Kripkean modality.Feng Ye - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):454-470.
Beyond modernity and tradition: A third way for development.Freya Mathews - 2006 - Ethics and the Environment 11 (2):85-113.
An onto-nomological theory of modality.Uwe Meixner - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):47-72.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza.Andrew Chignell - 2012 - Mind 121 (483):635-675.
References found in this work
No references found.