Journal of Semantics 26 (3):217-252 (2009)

Authors
Abstract
Comparative judgments for mass and count nouns yield two generalizations. First, all words that can be used in both mass and count syntax always denote individuals when used in count syntax but never when used in mass syntax. Second, some mass nouns denote individuals while others do not. In this article, we show that no current theory of mass–count semantics can capture these two facts and argue for an alternative theory that can. We propose that lexical roots are not specified as mass or count. Rather, a root becomes a mass noun or count noun by combining with a functional head. Some roots have denotations with individuals while others do not. The count head is interpreted as a function that maps denotations without individuals to those with individuals. The mass head is interpreted as an identity function making the interpretation of a mass noun equivalent to the interpretation of the root. As a result, all count nouns have individuals in their denotation, whereas mass counterparts of count nouns do not. Also, some roots that have individuals in their denotations can be used as mass nouns to denote individuals.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jos/ffp003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,448
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison.Arnim Stechovonw - 1984 - Journal of Semantics 3 (1-2):1-77.
Towards a Common Semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns.Brendan S. Gillon - 1992 - Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (6):597 - 639.
Scope and Comparatives.Richard K. Larson - 1988 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):1 - 26.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plurals and Mereology.Salvatore Florio & David Nicolas - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (3):415-445.
On the Semantics of Comparison Across Categories.Alexis Wellwood - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (1):67-101.
Q-Adjectives and the Semantics of Quantity.S. Solt - 2015 - Journal of Semantics 32 (2):221-273.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Count Nouns - Mass Nouns, Neat Nouns - Mess Nouns.Fred Landman - 2011 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6:12.
Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction.S. Rothstein - 2010 - Journal of Semantics 27 (3):343-397.
Count Nouns and Mass Nouns.H. W. Noonan - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):167-172.
Bare Nouns and Number in Dëne Sųłiné.Andrea Wilhelm - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (1):39-68.
Needing the Other: The Anatomy of the Mass Noun Thesis.Lajos L. Brons - 2014 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 4 (1):103-122.
Counting, Measuring And The Semantics Of Classifiers.Susan Rothstein - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6:1-42.
Mass Nouns in a Logic of Classes as Many.Nino B. Cocchiarella - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):343-361.
Talk About Stuffs & Things: The Logic of Mass and Count Nouns.Kathrin Koslicki - 1995 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
76 ( #139,929 of 2,446,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #148,576 of 2,446,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes