The significance of unpossessed evidence

Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):315-335 (2015)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords skepticism  disagreement  information overload  philosophical specialization  evidence  reasons  defeaters
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/pq/pqu096
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,141
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton University Press.
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Images Are Not the Evidence in Neuroimaging.Colin Klein - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):265-278.
The Origins of Medical Evidence: Communication and Experimentation.Joachim Widder - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):99-104.
Conciliatory Views of Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence.Jonathan Matheson - 2009 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 6 (3):269-279.
Luck, Knowledge and Value.Lee John Whittington - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1615-1633.
Conciliationism and Uniqueness.Nathan Ballantyne & E. J. Coffman - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):657-670.
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
Signifying Nothing: Reply to Hoover and Siegler.Deirdre N. McCloskey & Stephen T. Ziliak - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):39-55.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2015-09-01

Total downloads

103 ( #48,426 of 2,163,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

23 ( #15,396 of 2,163,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums