Flesh and Nature: Understanding Merleau-Ponty’s Relational Ontology

Research in Phenomenology 41 (3):327-357 (2011)
Authors
Bryan Bannon
University of North Florida
Abstract
In this paper I attempt to develop several ways Merleau-Ponty's ontology might contribute to an environmental ethic through a redefinition of his concept of flesh in terms of a general theory of affectivity. Currently accepted interpretations of the concept such as those in Abram, Toadvine, Barbaras, and Dastur rely upon conceiving flesh as a perceptual experience. I contest this interpretation and argue that a more productive conception of flesh emerges when understood in terms of Heidegger's philosophy. The paper concludes with a consideration of the normative significance of flesh by examining the role of “wildness“ within a place-based ethic
Keywords Merleau-Ponty  Nature  Relational Ontology  Flesh  Place
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
DOI 10.1163/156916411X594431
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,988
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Merleau-Ponty and the Measuring Body.Hoel Aud Sissel & Carusi Annamaria - 2018 - Theory, Culture and Society 35 (1):45-70.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

La chair comme diacritique incarné.Emmanuel Alloa - 2009 - Chiasmi International 11:249-262.
Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Depth.Anthony J. Steinbock - 1987 - Philosophy Today 31 (4):336-351.
Cultivating Ethos Through the Body.Seamus Carey - 2000 - Human Studies 23 (1):23-42.
Our Element: Flesh and Democracy in Merleau-Ponty. [REVIEW]Martín Plot - 2012 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):235-259.
Justice in the Flesh.David Klein-berg - 1990 - In Galen Johnson & Michael Smith (eds.), Ontology and Alterity in Merleau-Ponty. Northwestern University Press.
Touch and Flesh in Aristotle's de Anima.Rebecca Steiner Goldner - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Chiasm, Flesh, Figuration : Toward a Non-Positive Ontology.Véronique Fóti - 2009 - In Robert Vallier, Wayne Jeffrey Froman & Bernard Flynn (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. State University of New York Press.
Merleau-Pontean Flesh and its Buddhist Interpretation.Hyong-hyo Kim - 2009 - In Jin Y. Park & Gereon Kopf (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism. Lexington Books.
Tracework: Myself and Others in the Moral Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty and Levinas.David Michael Levin - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (3):345 – 392.
Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh.Renaud Barbaras - 2000 - In Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.). State University of New York Press. pp. 77-87.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-29

Total views
77 ( #88,718 of 2,312,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #175,904 of 2,312,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature