Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (3):204-213 (1973)

By way of conclusion, I have tried to show that rights do not come from nowhere, that is, rights are not sui generis. They come from claims. Rights do not make claims possible; rather claims make rights possible. For out of claims come claims to rights and from the welter of such claims to rights a legal system is established which, after sifting and refining, accepts some claims to rights and dignifies these as deeds, titles, rights and rejects others; and provides rules enabling persons to exercise their rights. A system of rights and rules thus generated gives one the right to make strong claims. Although having a right is not a condition for making a claim, having a right is necessary to sustain and appraise a claim. Appealing to rights enables us to distinguish weak from strong claims. For rights may sustain or rebut claims though they are not themselves claims.How can we appraise claims? A claim to implies a claim that, the latter being an outcome of the former. If the resulting claim is open to appraisal of the sustain/reject or true/false kind, then it is a claim in a sense other than a primitive cry in the wild. If one can go on to say of a claim that is open to appraisal that one has a right to make such a claim or that one has a strong claim, this is to give favorable, initial appraisal to a claim thus made; and is a claim not in a primitive but in a secondary and ultimately more significant sense
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00137336
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Development of Feinberg's Conception of Rights.Rex Martin - 1982 - Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1):29-45.
Education: Privilege, Claim, or Right?America D. Lapati - 1976 - Educational Theory 26 (1):19-28.
An Alternative to Claim-Theories of Rights.Robert Paul Finch - 1977 - Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (4):304-310.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

White on Rights and Claims.Samuel Stoljar - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):101 - 114.
Rights: Foundations, Contents, Hierarchy.John Edwards - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (3):277-293.
Promises, Rights and Claims.David Alm - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (1):51-76.
Neo-Positivism About Rights: The Problem with 'Rights as Enforceable Claims'.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):143–148.
Reconceptualizing Human Rights.Marcus Arvan - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):91-105.
More Comments on Rights and Claims.Andrew Halpin - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (3):271 - 310.
Environmental Claims and Citizen Rights.Leonard J. Waks - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):133-148.


Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #198,327 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes