The logic of Simpson’s paradox

Synthese 181 (2):185-208 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are three distinct questions associated with Simpson’s paradox. Why or in what sense is Simpson’s paradox a paradox? What is the proper analysis of the paradox? How one should proceed when confronted with a typical case of the paradox? We propose a “formal” answer to the first two questions which, among other things, includes deductive proofs for important theorems regarding Simpson’s paradox. Our account contrasts sharply with Pearl’s causal account of the first two questions. We argue that the “how to proceed question?” does not have a unique response, and that it depends on the context of the problem. We evaluate an objection to our account by comparing ours with Blyth’s account of the paradox. Our research on the paradox suggests that the “how to proceed question” needs to be divorced from what makes Simpson’s paradox “paradoxical.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic of Simpson Paradox.Jacek Malinowski - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):203-210.
Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Cartwright and Otte on Simpson's Paradox.Ellery Eells - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):233-243.
Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox.Susan Rogerson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Confirmation, Paradox, and Logic.Leif Eriksen - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
A Note on Forrester’s Paradox.Clayton Peterson & Jean-Pierre Marquis - 2012 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):53-70.
Equivalents of Mingle and Positive Paradox.Eric Schechter - 2004 - Studia Logica 77 (1):117 - 128.
The Medvedev Lattice of Computably Closed Sets.Sebastiaan A. Terwijn - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (2):179-190.
Quantifier Probability Logic and the Confirmation Paradox.Theodore Hailperin - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):83-100.
Simpson’s Paradox and the Fisher-Newcomb Problem.Carl G. Wagner - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):185-194.
Reassurance for the Logic of Paradox.Marcel Crabbé - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):479-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
20 (#558,968)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

D. S. Nelson
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

Mereological Dominance and Simpson’s Paradox.Tung-Ying Wu - 2020 - Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 48 (1):391–404.

Add more citations