Why there is Something rather than Nothing [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):679-680 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This does not directly answer the “why” question, but the fact that it doesn’t allows for this volume’s central point: the question itself is meaningless. Meaning is found in our dealings with the physical universe and takes the form of language. It is the use of language—grammar—which provides the philosophical standard for ruling a question meaningful or meaningless. Language cannot, then, be meaningful if extended beyond the physical universe: to God, for example, or even to the material world itself taken as a whole. Hence the “why” question is misconceived as is its demand for an answer. There is nothing to explain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotions and Biology.John F. Bannan - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (2):279-304.
Contemporary French Readings of Descartes.J. F. Bannan - 1960 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (3):412 - 438.
Merleau-Ponty and Metaphor. [REVIEW]John F. Bannan - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):370-371.
Merleau-Ponty on God.John F. Bannan - 1966 - International Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3):341-365.
Theories of Truth and Methodic Doubt.John F. Bannan - 1981 - Modern Schoolman 58 (2):105-112.
James's Joke and the Beginnings of the Science of Emotion.John F. Bannan - 2006 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (1):59 - 77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
92 (#180,101)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references