Aristotle's Argument for a Human Function

Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34:293-322 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A generally ignored feature of Aristotle’s famous function argument is its reliance on the claim that practitioners of the crafts (technai) have functions: but this claim does important work. Aristotle is pointing to the fact that we judge everyday rational agency and agents by norms which are independent of their contingent desires: a good doctor is not just one who happens to achieve his personal goals through his work. But, Aristotle argues, such norms can only be binding on individuals if human rational agency as such is governed by objective teleological norms.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's Function Argument.Sean McAleer - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 208–210.
The Function Argument in the Eudemian Ethics.Roy C. Lee - 2022 - Ancient Philosophy 42 (1):191-214.
The Limits of Eudaimonia in the Nicomachean Ethics.Schwartz Daniel - 2016 - Journal of Greco-Roman Studies 55 (3):35-52.
Teleology in Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy.Manuel Knoll - 2022 - Aither. Journal for the Study of Greek and Latin Philosophical Traditions (10):4–29.
The Virtues of Rational Agents.Terence Irwin - 1988 - In Aristotle's first principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
Human good and human function.Gavin Lawrence - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 37–75.


Added to PP

3,042 (#2,502)

6 months
346 (#6,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachel Barney
University of Toronto, St. George

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references