Authors
Sam Baron
Australian Catholic University
Abstract
There is an old meta-philosophical worry: very roughly, metaphysical theories have no observational consequences and so the study of metaphysics has no value. The worry has been around in some form since the rise of logical positivism in the early twentieth century but has seen a bit of a renaissance recently. In this paper, I provide an apology for metaphysics in the face of this kind of concern. The core of the argument is this: pure mathematics detaches from science in much the same manner as metaphysics and yet it is valuable nonetheless. The source of value enjoyed by pure mathematics extends to metaphysics as well. Accordingly, if one denies that metaphysics has value, then one is forced to deny that pure mathematics has value. The argument places an added burden on the sceptic of metaphysics. If one truly believes that metaphysics is worthless (as some philosophers do), then one must give up on pure mathematics as well.
Keywords Metaphysics  Metametaphysics  Naturalism  Mathematics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.039
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-36.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meta-Metaphysics.Tuomas Tahko - 2018 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.James Tomberlin (ed.) - 2002 - Blackwell.
There is No Special Problem with Metaphysics.Karen Bennett - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):21-37.
Dummett, Brouwer and the Metaphysics of Mathematics.Eric P. Tsui-James - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55:143-168.
Mathematics, Metaphysics and Intuition in Kant.Emily Carson - 1996 - Dissertation, Harvard University
An Introduction to Mathematical Metaphysics.Christopher Langan - 2017 - Cosmos and History 13 (2):313-330.
Dummett, Brouwer and the Metaphysics of Mathematics.Eric P. Tsui-James - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55:143-168.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-20

Total views
7,492 ( #145 of 2,324,591 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
151 ( #3,025 of 2,324,591 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes