A moment of unconditional validity? Schutz and the habermas/rorty debate

Human Studies 27 (1):51-67 (2004)
Richard Rorty challenges Jurgen Habermas's belief that validity-claims raised within context-bound discussions contain a moment of universality validity. Rorty argues that immersion within contingent languages prohibits any neutral, context-independent ground, that one cannot predict the defense of one's assertions before any audience, and that philosophy can no more escape its contextual limitations than strategic counterparts. Alfred Schutz's phenomenological account of motivation, the reciprocity of perspectives, and the theoretical province of meaning can articulate Habermas's intuitions.Since any claim can be analyzed from an observer's perspective for its because-motives, it can always be shown to be context-related; but to the participant involved in the in-order-to project of establishing a claim's validity, the claim appears objectively valid until counter-evidence surfaces. Rorty, even when explaining what it is to make a truth claim, resorts to the observer perspective and omits reference to the in-order-to perspective, within which alone unconditional validity becomes visible. Furthermore, the expectation that one's claim is universally valid depends not on an empirical prediction that one''s claim can survive hypothesized future possible audiences. Rather, because of the reciprocity of perspectives, making possible communication and a common life, theoreticians assume that others will recognize what they take to be objective or valid, independently of diverse biographical circumstances. Finally, within the theoretical province requiring relevances different from those of everyday life, philosophy articulates claims with a greater potential to arrive at universal validity than projects that aim less universally, in spite of the fact that its theoretical context is always susceptible to because motive analysis.
Keywords Richard Rorty  Jurgen Habermas  Discourse ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012247.79184.3e
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,553
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.R. Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Phenomenology of the Social World.Alfred Schutz - 1967 - Northwestern University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Habermas and Validity Claims.Jari I. Niemi - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):227 – 244.
Richard Rorty's Philosophical Legacy.Steve Fuller - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):121-132.
Gadamer, Rorty, Hermeneutics, and Truth: A Response to Warnke.Donald Rothberg - 1986 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):355-361.
What is a Validity Claim?Joseph Heath - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

36 ( #142,792 of 2,168,326 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,758 of 2,168,326 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums