Human Studies 27 (1):51-67 (2004)

Abstract
Richard Rorty challenges Jurgen Habermas's belief that validity-claims raised within context-bound discussions contain a moment of universality validity. Rorty argues that immersion within contingent languages prohibits any neutral, context-independent ground, that one cannot predict the defense of one's assertions before any audience, and that philosophy can no more escape its contextual limitations than strategic counterparts. Alfred Schutz's phenomenological account of motivation, the reciprocity of perspectives, and the theoretical province of meaning can articulate Habermas's intuitions.Since any claim can be analyzed from an observer's perspective for its because-motives, it can always be shown to be context-related; but to the participant involved in the in-order-to project of establishing a claim's validity, the claim appears objectively valid until counter-evidence surfaces. Rorty, even when explaining what it is to make a truth claim, resorts to the observer perspective and omits reference to the in-order-to perspective, within which alone unconditional validity becomes visible. Furthermore, the expectation that one's claim is universally valid depends not on an empirical prediction that one''s claim can survive hypothesized future possible audiences. Rather, because of the reciprocity of perspectives, making possible communication and a common life, theoreticians assume that others will recognize what they take to be objective or valid, independently of diverse biographical circumstances. Finally, within the theoretical province requiring relevances different from those of everyday life, philosophy articulates claims with a greater potential to arrive at universal validity than projects that aim less universally, in spite of the fact that its theoretical context is always susceptible to because motive analysis.
Keywords Richard Rorty  Jurgen Habermas  Discourse ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012247.79184.3e
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority.Emmanuel Levinas - 1961 - Distribution for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rorty's Ethical de-Divinization of the Moralist Self.Michael D. Barber - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):135-147.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is a Validity Claim?Joseph Heath - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41.
Gadamer, Rorty, Hermeneutics, and Truth: A Response to Warnke.Donald Rothberg - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):355-361.
Richard Rorty's Philosophical Legacy.Steve Fuller - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):121-132.
Habermas and Validity Claims.Jari I. Niemi - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):227 – 244.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
45 ( #232,076 of 2,439,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,243 of 2,439,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes