Philosophia 46 (2):255-274 (2018)

The paper proposes with Davidson that the talk of metaontology is literally meaningless, but with Wittgenstein that it is so in a way that grants a unique type of insight. More specifically, it argues both that Davidson’s arguments have a cogency that is hard to dismiss, and also that, since his own arguments are metaontological, they are self-referential, and consequently in turn undermine their own meaning as well. The paper argues further that metaontological statements cannot be avoided. Consequently, this kind of statement constitutes an unavoidable self-referential paradox that means what it also excludes as capable of meaning. The result is a reinstatement of the meaning of ontological insight and in fact, the paper argues, a deep enrichment and also a particularly cogent justification of it. In addition, the logical peculiarity of the paradox involved has further useful consequences for the outcome of this justification, including a mutually illuminating commonality with some versions of metaethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-017-9928-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Zettel.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1967 - Berkeley and Los Angeles: Blackwell.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Language Learning in Wittgenstein and Davidson.Ben Kotzee - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):413-431.
The Search for the "Essence of Human Language" in Wittgenstein and Davidson.Jason Bridges - forthcoming - In Claudine Verheggen (ed.), Wittgenstein and Davidson on Language, Thought and Action. cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 139-158.
Wittgenstein and Davidson: Meaning and Agreement.David Athony Checkland - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Observaciones sobre la verdad: de Davidson a Wittgenstein. Remarks on truth. From Davidson to Wittgenstein.Pedro Rojas Parada - 2006 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 39 (1):29-51.
Commentary on Insight, Delusion, and Belief.Larry Davidson - 1994 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1 (4):243-244.
Death: 'Nothing' Gives Insight.Eric J. Ettema - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):575-585.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #896,515 of 2,499,262 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,163 of 2,499,262 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes