European Journal of Social Theory 12 (2):195-211 (2009)
Abstract |
The concept of self-interest is core to modern understandings of individual desire and need. It is also central in the concept of homo economicus and, in a variety of forms, underpins economic science. The critical discussion of the notion of self-interest in William Hazlitt, An Essay on the Principles of Human Action, remains unknown in sociology and economics even though it resolves a number of key problems associated with the concept and makes an original, indeed, unique contribution to action theory. In particular, Hazlitt shows that the basis on which an individual pursues their own interest is identical with their sympathy with the interests of others. Hazlitt shows that a clear distinction between self and other cannot be sustained, and that an individual is as remote from their future self as they are from any other person. Even the `sexual appetite' Hazlitt shows cannot be understood in terms of simple self-interest as it is stimulated and consummated through mental and reciprocal capacities. These and related aspects of Hazlitt's Principles are set out below, and their relevance for an understanding of self-interested action and self-formation is demonstrated.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/1368431009103705 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Mind, Self, and Society From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist.G. H. Mead & C. W. Morris - 1935 - Philosophy 10 (40):493-495.
Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach.Jack M. Barbalet - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Hazlitt on the Future of the Self.Raymond Martin & John Barresi - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (3):463.
View all 7 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Essay on the Principles of Human Action. To Which Are Added, Some Remarks on the Systems of Hartley and Helvetius [by W. Hazlitt].William Hazlitt - 1805
Essays on the Principles of Human Action; on the Systems of Hartley and Helvetius; and on Abstract Ideas, by W. Hazlitt, Ed. By His Son.William Hazlitt - 1835
An Essay on the Principles of Human Action. To Which Are Added, Some Remarks on the Systems of Hartley and Helvetius [by W. Hazlitt]. Facs. Reprod., with an Intr. By J.R. Nahholtz. [REVIEW]William Hazlitt - 1969
An Essay on the Principles of Human Action.William Hazlitt - 1805 - Gainesville, Fla., Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.
Hazlitt on the Future of the Self.Raymond Martin & John Baressi - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (3).
Self-Love and Misanthropy: William Hazlitt on Hobbes.Mark Garnett - 1995 - History of Political Thought 16 (4):558-575.
The Æthetics of William Hazlitt a Study of the Philosophical Basis of His Criticism.Elisabeth Wintersteen Schneider - 1969 - Octagon Books.
An Essay on the Principles of Human Action and Some Remarks on the Systems of Hartley and Helvetius.William Hazlitt - 1969 - Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.
An Abridgment [by W. Hazlitt] of the Light of Nature Pursued, by A. Tucker.William Hazlitt & Abraham Tucker - 1807
The Youth's Pocket Note-Book [Containing Selections From Lord Chesterfield's Letters to His Son and Hazlitt's on the Conduct of Life, Advice to a Schoolboy Followed by a Memoranda Book] Compiled by G.N. Hester.Philip Dormer Stanhope, William Hazlitt & George Norman Hester - 1902
Self-Concern From Priestley to Hazlitt.John Barresi & Raymond Martin - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (3):499 – 507.
The Endless Construction of Charity: On Milbank's Critique of Political Economy.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):301 - 324.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-25
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2020-11-25
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.