Oxford University Press (2007)
This book examines the hypothesis of "direct compositionality", which requires that semantic interpretation proceed in tandem with syntactic combination. Although associated with the dominant view in formal semantics of the 1970s and 1980s, the feasibility of direct compositionality remained unsettled, and more recently the discussion as to whether or not this view can be maintained has receded. The syntax-semantics interaction is now often seen as a process in which the syntax builds representations which, at the abstract level of logical form, are sent for interpretation to the semantics component of the language faculty. In the first extended discussion of the hypothesis of direct compositionality for twenty years, this book considers whether its abandonment might have been premature and whether in fact direct compositionality is not after all a simpler and more effective conception of the grammar than the conventional account of the syntax-semantics interface in generative grammar. It contains contributions from both sides of the debate, locates the debate in the setting of a variety of formal theories, and draws on examples from a range of languages and a range of empirical phenomena
|Keywords||Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax Semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$38.00 used (45% off) $54.00 new (21% off) $68.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||P295.D57 2007|
12.1 Direct Compositionality Beyond the Sentence Level.Kent Bach, Chris Barker, Kai von Fintel, Lyn Frazier, James Isaacs, Angelika Kratzer, Bill Ladusaw, Helen Majewski, Line Mikkelsen & Barbara Partee
Degree Quantifiers, Position of Merger Effects with Their Restrictors, and Conservativity.Rajesh Bhatt & Roumyana Pancheva
The Non Concealed Nature of Free Relatives: Implications for Connectivity Crosslinguistically.Ivano Caponigro & Daphna Heller
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Review of the Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts. [REVIEW]Patricia Amaral, Craige Roberts & E. Allyn Smith - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):707-749.
Pure Quotation and General Compositionality.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):381-415.
Prototypes as Compositional Components of Concepts.Guillermo Del Pinal - 2016 - Synthese 193 (9):2899–2927.
Similar books and articles
The Syntax and Semantics of Split Constructions: A Comparative Study.Alastair Butler - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives.Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers of Barbara Partee.Barbara Hall Partee - 2004 - Blackwell.
ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: I: Syntactic and Semantic Assumptions: Compositionality.Emmon Bach - unknown
Syntactic Effects of Conjunctivist Semantics: Unifying Movement and Adjunction.Tim Hunter - 2011 - John Benjamins Pub. Company.
Syntax and Semantics: An Overview.Arnim von Stechow - 2012 - In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #90,952 of 2,146,210 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,123 of 2,146,210 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.