Evidence and leverage: Comment on Roush

provides a sustained and ambitious development of the basic idea that knowledge is true belief that tracks the truth. In this essay, I provide a quick synopsis of Roush's book and offer a substantive discussion of her analysis of scientific evidence. Roush argues that, for e to serve as evidence for h, it should be easier to determine the truth value of e than it is to determine the truth value of h, an ideal she refers to as ‘leverage’. She defends a detailed method by which the value of p(h/e) is computed without ‘direct’ information about p(h) but only using evidence about the value of p(e), from which the value of p(h) is derived. She presents an example of how to use her leverage method, which I argue involves a certain critical mistake. I show how the leveraging method can be used in a way that is sound—I conclude with a few remarks about the importance of distinguishing clearly between prior and posterior probabilities. CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axn022
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Replies. [REVIEW]Sherrilyn Roush - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):240-247.
Précis of Tracking Truth. [REVIEW]Sherrilyn Roush - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):213-222.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
29 ( #183,248 of 2,202,702 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,702 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature