Perspectives on Science 13 (2):142-165 (2005)

Abstract
: "Technoscience" is now most commonly used in academic work to refer to sets of activities wherein science and technology have become inextricably intermingled, or else have hybridized in some sense. What, though, do we understand by "science" and by "technology"? The use of these terms has varied greatly, but their current use presumes a society with extensive institutional and occupational differentiation. Only in that kind of context may science and technology be treated as "other" in relation to "the rest" of the social order; whether as differentiated sets of practices or as specialized institutional forms. References to "technoscience" may then be taken to imply a reversal of earlier processes of cultural and institutional differentiation and/or a recombination of separate bodies of practice and skill. Either way a move back to a less differentiated state is implied, which makes it surprising that we appear to have very few memories of technoscience in periods less culturally and institutionally differentiated than our own and a lower level of technical and intellectual division of labor. However, the elusiveness of our memories of technoscience may be significant mainly for what it suggests about our ways of conceptualizing the past, rather than for any insight it offers into that past "itself." We tend to identify practices and networks of practices in terms of functions. And it may be because, at different times, different functions have been selected as constitutive of practices, that "technoscience" has come to be regarded as something especially characteristic of the present
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361405774270520
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,029
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Technoscience avant la lettre.Ursula Klein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):226-266.
The Social Origins of Modern Science.Edgar Zilsel - 2000 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

From Dyes to Iraq: A Reply to Jonathan Harwood.Andrew Pickering - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (3):416-425.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience. [REVIEW]Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Sacha Loeve, Alfred Nordmann & Astrid Schwarz - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):365-383.
The Philosophical Impact of Technoscience or the Development of a Pragmatic Philosophy of Science.Ramón Queraltó - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
Technoscience and the 'Other' Continental Philosophy.Don Ihde - 2000 - Continental Philosophy Review 33 (1):59-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #162,322 of 2,427,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #146,134 of 2,427,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes