Facts vs. Opinions: Helping Students Overcome the Distinction

Teaching Philosophy 45 (3):267-277 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many students struggle to enter moral debates in a productive way because they automatically think of moral claims as ‘just opinions’ and not something one could productively argue about. Underlying this response are various versions of a muddled distinction between ‘facts’ and ‘opinions.’ This paper outlines a way to help students overcome their use of this distinction, thereby clearing an obstacle to true moral debate. It explains why the fact-opinion distinction should simply be scrapped, rather than merely sharpened. It then proposes a different distinction well suited to replace it. Finally, it outlines an activity which can be used to teach the new distinction, as well as a number of benefits to attempting the whole replacement process.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

More Experiments in Ethics.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2010 - Neuroethics 3 (3):233-242.
Seeke true religion. Oh, where?Michael McGhee - 2006 - Ratio 19 (4):454–473.
Fact and Opinion.Debby Hutchins & David Kelley - 2023 - Informal Logic 43 (3):352-368.
Facts and Feelings.Thomas Michael North - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
Thick Concepts.Debbie Roberts - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):677-688.
God's Justified Knowledge and the Hard-Soft Fact Distinction.John R. Shook - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:69-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-24

Downloads
733 (#28,360)

6 months
311 (#5,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Galen Barry
Iona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references