Humean learning (how to learn)

Philosophical Studies:1-17 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

David Hume’s skeptical solution to the problem of induction was grounded in his belief that we learn by means of custom. We consider here how a form of reinforcement learning like custom may allow an agent to learn how to learn in other ways as well. Specifically, an agent may learn by simple reinforcement to adopt new forms of learning that work better than simple reinforcement in the context of specific tasks. We will consider how such a bootstrapping process may lead to a system that includes trial-and-error forms of learning like win-stay/lose-shift, probe and adjust, and simple reinforcement itself together with higher-rationality inferential tools.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-21

Downloads
59 (#291,440)

6 months
29 (#135,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Barrett
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The formation of learning sets.Harry F. Harlow - 1949 - Psychological Review 56 (1):51-65.
Animal Intelligence.W. B. Pillsbury & Edward L. Thorndike - 1899 - Philosophical Review 8 (2):207.
Self-assembling Games.Jeffrey A. Barrett & Brian Skyrms - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2):329-353.

View all 16 references / Add more references