The meaning of words, according to Wittgenstein, is grounded in their use – in the ways they are used. This does not mean only that in order to know the meaning of a word we should look at its use; it is not only a practical recommendation for the linguist or the learner. It is rather a philosophical thesis about the very notion of meaning, according to which use is what constitutes meaning, and about what the very ascription of meaning to a word amounts to. This position calls for a deep investigation of the notion of use – an investigation that preoccupied Wittgenstein throughout his career: What is the notion of use involved here and in what concepts should it be conceived? What are its constituents and what is its extension? How is a word connected with a particular kind of use that constitutes its meaning? What is the nature of the knowledge and the human capacity that are involved in understanding a word and knowing its use?



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Meaning, signification, and suggestion: Berkeley on general words.Timothy Pritchard - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):301-317.
Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning.Roy A. Moxley - 1997 - Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
Semantic components, meaning, and use in ethnosemantics.Cecil H. Brown - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):378-395.
Theory of meaning.Adrienne Lehrer - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall. Edited by Keith Lehrer.


Added to PP

64 (#248,320)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Correction.[author unknown] - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):268-268.
Correction.Bmj Publishing Group Ltd And Institute Of Medical Ethics - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (1):62-62.

Add more references