Is language processing different in dialogue?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):190-191 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) claim that the automatic mechanisms that underlie language processing in dialogue are absent in monologue. We disagree with this claim, and argue that dialogue simply provides a different context in which the same basic processes operate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Blind men, elephants, and dancing information processors.Chris Westbury - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):645-646.
Dialogue: Can two be cheaper than one?Sam Glucksberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-199.
Linguistics fit for dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
A call for more dialogue and more details.J. Cooper Cutting - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):194-194.
Semantic processing for finite domains.Martha Stone Palmer - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#278,942)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references