Inner-Model Reflection Principles

Studia Logica 108 (3):573-595 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We introduce and consider the inner-model reflection principle, which asserts that whenever a statement \varphi(a) in the first-order language of set theory is true in the set-theoretic universe V, then it is also true in a proper inner model W \subset A. A stronger principle, the ground-model reflection principle, asserts that any such \varphi(a) true in V is also true in some non-trivial ground model of the universe with respect to set forcing. These principles each express a form of width reflection in contrast to the usual height reflection of the Lévy–Montague reflection theorem. They are each equiconsistent with ZFC and indeed \Pi_2-conservative over ZFC, being forceable by class forcing while preserving any desired rank-initial segment of the universe. Furthermore, the inner-model reflection principle is a consequence of the existence of sufficient large cardinals, and lightface formulations of the reflection principles follow from the maximality principle MP and from the inner-model hypothesis IMH. We also consider some questions concerning the expressibility of the principles.

Similar books and articles

On strong forms of reflection in set theory.Sy-David Friedman & Radek Honzik - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (1-2):52-58.
Maximality Principles in Set Theory.Luca Incurvati - 2017 - Philosophia Mathematica 25 (2):159-193.
The Ground Axiom.Jonas Reitz - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1299 - 1317.
A Strong Reflection Principle.Sam Roberts - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):651-662.
Reflection Principles and Second-Order Choice Principles with Urelements.Bokai Yao - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (4):103073.
On Strong Forms of Reflection in Set Theory.Sy-David Friedman & Radek Honzik - 2018 - In Carolin Antos, Sy-David Friedman, Radek Honzik & Claudio Ternullo (eds.), The Hyperuniverse Project and Maximality. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. pp. 125-134.
A simple maximality principle.Joel David Hamkins - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):527-550.


Added to PP

372 (#58,123)

6 months
114 (#45,948)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Are Large Cardinal Axioms Restrictive?Neil Barton - 2023 - Philosophia Mathematica 31 (3):372-407.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Set-theoretic geology.Gunter Fuchs, Joel David Hamkins & Jonas Reitz - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (4):464-501.
The downward directed grounds hypothesis and very large cardinals.Toshimichi Usuba - 2017 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 17 (2):1750009.
The Ground Axiom.Jonas Reitz - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1299 - 1317.

View all 16 references / Add more references