Is vagueness Sui generis ?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5 – 34 (2009)
On the dominant view of vagueness, if it is vague whether Harry is bald, then it is unsettled, not merely epistemically, but metaphysically, whether Harry is bald. In other words, vagueness is a type of indeterminacy. On the standard alternative, vagueness is a type of ignorance: if it is vague whether Harry is bald, then, even though it is metaphysically settled whether Harry is bald, we cannot know whether Harry is bald. On my view, vagueness is neither a type of indeterminacy nor a type of ignorance. Rather, it is sui generis.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400802237376
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,453
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
David Barnett (2013). Vague Entailment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):325 - 335.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

117 ( #38,398 of 1,925,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #88,309 of 1,925,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.