Kann es rational sein, eine inkonsistente Theorie zu akzeptieren?(Eine Untersuchung zum frühen Bohrschen Atommodell)

Philosophia Naturalis 26 (1):91-120 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Drei Versionen der Meinongschen Logik.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2005 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 59 (1):49-70.
Zur Struktur ästhetischer Wertäußerungen.Werner Strube - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):167-180.
Heideggers denken Van het zijn AlS een denken Van het verlangen.Ben Vedder - 1985 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (3):451 - 472.
Eine logische Rekonstruktion der platonischen Prädikationstheorie.Uwe Meixner - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):163-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Bartelborth
Universität Leipzig

Citations of this work

Scientific Theory Eliminativism.Peter Vickers - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (1):111-126.
Can Partial Structures Accommodate Inconsistent Science?Peter Vickers - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (2):133-250.
Bohr's theory of the atom 1913–1923: A case study in the progress of scientific research programmes.Hinne Hettema - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (3):307-323.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references