Le concept de fusion en morphologie vegetale chez Payer et chez Van tieghem

Acta Biotheoretica 28 (3):204-216 (1979)
Abstract
The meaning of the concept of fusion is discussed in relation with the works of Payer and those of Van Tieghem. It is pointed out that there is a difference, at the theoretical level, between the concept of fusion congénitale as defined by Payer and the concept of concrescence congénitale formulated by Van Tieghem. The former is inobservable by definition, while the latter deals with intercalary growth. For Van Tieghem, anatomy can prove the existence of fusion, even if we do not see it during ontogenesis.We distinguish three complementary methods for explaining the unions of organs: ontogenetic, typological and phylogenetic. We have attempted, not so much to defend one or other of these methods, as to show that they often invoke very different interpretations for the same morphological phenomena. It is probable that only an analysis of the writings of 19th century botanists will clarify the concept of fusion and more generally the epistemology of plant morphology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00046353
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,824
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Concept of Fusion in Dewey's Aesthetic Theory.Stephen C. Pepper - 1953 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (2):169-176.
Fusion Over Sublanguages.Assaf Hasson & Martin Hils - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):361 - 398.
Belief Fusion: Aggregating Pedigreed Belief States. [REVIEW]Pedrito Maynard-Reid II & Yoav Shoham - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):183-209.
What Is Classical Mereology?Paul Hovda - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (1):55 - 82.
Fusion Confusion.David H. Sanford - 2003 - Analysis 63 (277):1–4.
The Mereological Constancy of Masses.Charlie Tanksley - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):343-354.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

13 ( #357,701 of 2,178,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums