History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):115-126 (2020)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1177/0952695119888991 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 17 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Reply to My Commentators – Review Symposium on Leys’s The Ascent of Affect.Ruth Leys - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):150-159.
Freud in Cambridge Review Symposium.Felicity Callard & Sarah Marks - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (2):194-197.
Similar books and articles
Reply to My Commentators – Review Symposium on Leys’s The Ascent of Affect.Ruth Leys - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):150-159.
Affect Theory’s Alternative Genealogies – Review Symposium on Leys’s The Ascent of Affect.Carolyn Pedwell - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):134-142.
Affect, Genealogy, History – Review Symposium on Ruth Leys’s The Ascent of Affect.Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):143-150.
From the Ashes, a Fertile Opportunity for Historicism – Review Symposium on Leys’s The Ascent of Affect.Rob Boddice - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):126-133.
Essay Review: Why Can't Science Be More Like History: A Response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique. [REVIEW]Dr James Nikopoulos - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75:57-61.
Why Can't Science Be More Like History: A Response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.Dr James Nikopoulos - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
The Ascent of Affect: Genealogy and Critique: By Ruth Leys, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 2017, 390 Pp., USD$35 , ISBN - 13: 978 - 0 - 226 - 48856 - 1, ISBN - 10: 0 - 226 - 48856 - X. [REVIEW]Alison Ross - 2019 - Critical Horizons 20 (3):282-284.
Critical Response I - The Complexity of Intention.William E. Connolly - 2011 - Critical Inquiry 37 (4):791-798.
The Eleusinian Mysteries in Pre-Platonic Thought. Metaphor, Practise and Imagery for Plato’s Symposium.Barbara Sattler - 2013 - In Vishwa Adluri (ed.), Greek Religion, Philosophy and Salvation. de Gruyter. pp. 151-190.
IIAffect, Intentionality, and Cognition: A Response to Ruth Leys.Charles Altieri - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):878-881.
Plato on the Pangs of Love.Mehmet M. Erginel - 2016 - In Mauro Tulli & Michael Erler (eds.), The Selected Papers of the Tenth Symposium Platonicum. 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany: pp. 231-236.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-19
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,361 )
2020-06-19
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,361 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
