Nonconsequentialist decisions

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):1-10. Translated by Jonathan Baron (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to a simple form of consequentialism, we should base decisions on our judgments about their consequences for achieving our goals. Our goals give us reason to endorse consequentialism as a standard of decision making. Alternative standards invariably lead to consequences that are less good in this sense. Yet some people knowingly follow decision rules that violate consequentialism. For example, they prefer harmful omissions to less harmful acts, they favor the status quo over alternatives they would otherwise judge to be belter, they provide third-party compensation on the basis of the cause of an injury rather than the benefit from the compensation, they ignore deterrent effects in decisions about punishment, and they resist coercive reforms they judge to be beneficial. I suggest that nonconsequentialist principles arise from overgeneralizing rules that are consistent with consequentialism in a limited set of cases. Commitment to such rules is detached from their original purposes. The existence of such nonconsequentialist decision biases has implications for philosophical and experimental methodology, the relation between psychology and public policy, and education.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alternative perspectives on omission bias.Christopher J. Anderson - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):544-544.
Normative models in psychology are here to stay.Keith E. Stanovich - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):268-269.
Normative and prescriptive implications of individual differences.Jonathan Baron - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):668-669.
Incoherence and irrationality.Donald Davidson - 1985 - Dialectica 39 (4):345-54.
Epistemic Consequentialism.Philip Percival - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):121–151.
Epistemic consequentialism.Robert Stalnaker - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):153–168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
68 (#234,507)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.

View all 124 references / Add more references