Australasian Journal of Logic 17 (4):158-200 (2020)

Authors
Giorgio Venturi
University of Campinas
Claudio Ternullo
Universitat de Barcelona
Neil Barton
Universität Konstanz
Abstract
In the contemporary philosophy of set theory, discussion of new axioms that purport to resolve independence necessitates an explanation of how they come to be justified. Ordinarily, justification is divided into two broad kinds: intrinsic justification relates to how `intuitively plausible' an axiom is, whereas extrinsic justification supports an axiom by identifying certain `desirable' consequences. This paper puts pressure on how this distinction is formulated and construed. In particular, we argue that the distinction as often presented is neither well-demarcated nor sufficiently precise. Instead, we suggest that the process of justification in set theory should not be thought of as neatly divisible in this way, but should rather be understood as a conceptually indivisible notion linked to the goal of explanation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019, 2020
DOI 10.26686/ajl.v17i4.6579
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Believe Infinite Sets Exist?Andrei Mărăşoiu - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (4):447-460.
Propositional Justification and Infinitism.Tito Flores - 2017 - Manuscrito 40 (4):141-158.
The Intertwinement of Propositional and Doxastic Justification.Giacomo Melis - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):367-379.
Causal Reference and Epistemic Justification.Jane Duran - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
Justificação, coerência e circularidade.Júlio César Burdzinski - 2005 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 50 (4):65-93.
Sosa on Knowledge From Testimony.Stephen Wright - 2014 - Analysis 74 (2):249-254.
Justification À la Mode and Justification Simpliciter.Jane Duran - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
Does Doxastic Justification Have a Basing Requirement?Paul Silva - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):371-387.
Structural Justification.Robert Audi - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:473-492.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-07

Total views
223 ( #50,542 of 2,506,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #26,393 of 2,506,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes