Obstacles to Cybernetics becoming a Conceptual Framework and Metanarrative in the Psychologies

Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):524-527 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology” by Bernard Scott. Upshot: Scott’s ideas of a unifying conceptual framework and metanarrative for the seemingly divergent psychology fields may be met with challenges. Four obstacles are presented, which can be addressed in order to mitigate resistance to Scott achieving his goal of cybernetics fulfilling these dual roles in the psychologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology.Bernard C. E. Scott Scott - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):509-517.
Second Thoughts on Cybernetic Unifications.T. Stingl de Vasconcelos Guedes - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):528-530.
A Theatre for Exploring the Cybernetic.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):619-620.
Quality and Qualifications.G. Zeeuw - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):138-139.
Beware False Dichotomies.P. A. Cariani - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):472-475.
What Can Cybernetics Learn from Design?C. M. Herr - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):583-585.
Second-Order Cybernetics Needs a Unifying Methodology.T. R. Flanagan - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):475-478.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-15

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references