Abstract
Dan Zahavi has questioned whether the use of a transcendental phenomenological epoché is essential for phenomenological psychology. He criticizes the views of Amedeo Giorgi by asserting that Husserl did not view the transcendental reduction as needed for an entrance into phenomenological psychology and that, if one thinks so, phenomenological psychology would be in danger of being absorbed within transcendental phenomenology. Thirdly, rather than envisioning transcendental phenomenology as a purification for phenomenological psychology, Zahavi recommends a dialogue between transcendental phenomenologists and psychologists. However, the two disciplines are closer for Husserl who also conceives phenomenological psychology as a self-standing science, and Giorgi is not as rigid on the necessity of transcendental phenomenology for phenomenological psychology. Alfred Schutz, following Husserl’s “Nachwort,” develops his own distinctive phenomenological psychology that appreciates disciplinary convergences and respects boundaries, while also articulating a wider understanding of epoché as an anthropological fact operative beyond the limits of transcendental phenomenology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15691624-12341390
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché.Dan Zahavi - 2021 - Continental Philosophy Review 54 (2):259-273.
Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché.Dan Zahavi - 2019 - Continental Philosophy Review (2):1-15.
Zahavi Versus Brentano: A Rejoinder.Kenneth Williford - 2006 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 12.
On Shame – In Response to Dan Zahavi, Self and Other.Rowland Stout - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (5):634-638.
What is Schutzian Phenomenology?Carlos Belvedere - 2013 - Schutzian Research 5:65-80.
What is Schutzian Phenomenology?Carlos Belvedere - 2013 - Schutzian Research 5:65-80.
What is Schutzian Phenomenology? Outlining the Program of Social Phenomenology.Carlos Belvedere - 2013 - Schutzian Research. A Yearbook of Worldly Phenomenology and Qualitative Social Science 5 (2013):65-80.
Phenomenology Is Not a Servant of Science.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (1):33-36.
Zahavi and the Scope of Empathy.Meline Papazian - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (5):629-634.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-28

Total views
8 ( #1,006,718 of 2,507,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,082 of 2,507,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes