Philosophy and history in the study of political thought

Abstract
This article analyzes how the relationship between philosophy and history has been conceived within the study of political thought, and how different ways of conceiving this relationship in turn have affected the definition of the subject matter as well as the choice of methods within this field. My main argument is that the ways in which we conceive this relationship is dependent on the assumptions we make about the ontological status of concepts and their meaning. I start by discussing the widespread view that philosophy and history ought to be viewed as distinct if not incompatible ways of studying political thought, and then go on to describe the view that philosophical and historical approaches should be conceived of as identical or inseparable. I end this article by suggesting that these approaches rather should be viewed as mutually constitutive for the benefit of a more coherent study of political thought.
Keywords SEMANTICS   CONCEPTUAL HISTORY   HERMENEUTICS   POLITICAL THEORY   CONTEXTUALISM   DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187226307X176794
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
46 ( #117,217 of 2,197,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,964 of 2,197,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature