Proof-functional connectives and realizability

Archive for Mathematical Logic 33 (3):189-211 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The meaning of a formula built out of proof-functional connectives depends in an essential way upon the intensional aspect of the proofs of the component subformulas. We study three such connectives, strong equivalence (where the two directions of the equivalence are established by mutually inverse maps), strong conjunction (where the two components of the conjunction are established by the same proof) and relevant implication (where the implication is established by an identity map). For each of these connectives we give a type assignment system, a realizability semantics, and a completeness theorem. This form of completeness implies the semantic completeness of the type assignment system

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,335

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
22 (#819,194)

6 months
7 (#926,546)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proof theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1975 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
The lambda calculus: its syntax and semantics.Hendrik Pieter Barendregt - 1984 - New York, N.Y.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
The semantics of entailment — III.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):192 - 208.
Algebraic analysis of entailment I.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1972 - Logique Et Analyse 15 (59/60):407-428.
Combinatory Logic, Volume I.Haskell B. Curry, Robert Feys & William Craig - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):548-550.

View all 8 references / Add more references