Review of Metaphysics 32 (4):738-740 (1979)

Steven James Bartlett
Willamette University
This review article provides a brief descriptive overview of past efforts to use self-referential argumentation, distinguishing pragmatical from metalogical self-referential approaches. The reviewer claims that the pragmatical self-referential argument proposed in this book is itself metalogically self-referentially inconsistent, and directs the reader to other relevant published works by the reviewer.
Keywords self-referential argumentation  self-reference  reflexivity  metalogical self-reference  pragmatical self-reference
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflexivity: A Source-Book in Self-Reference.Steven James Bartlett (ed.) - 1992 - Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
¿Descripciones definidas referenciales?Pierre Baumann - 2011 - Princípios 18 (29):285-298.
Intuitions, Disagreement and Referential Pluralism.James Andow - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (2):223-239.
Perlis on Strong and Weak Self-Reference--A Mirror Reversal.Damjan Bojadziev - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (5):60-66.
Self-Reference and the Languages of Arithmetic.Richard Heck - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):1-29.


Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #135,266 of 2,403,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #50,331 of 2,403,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes