Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174 (1996)

Abstract
Peer reporting is a specific form of whistelblowing in which an individual discloses the wrongdoing of a peer. Previous studies have examined situational variables thought to influence a person's decision to report the wrongdoing of a peer. The present study looked at peer reporting from the individual level. Five hypotheses were developed concerning the relationships between (1) religiosity and ethical ideology, (2) ethical ideology and ethical judgments about peer reporting, and (3) ethical judgments and intentions to report peer wrongdoing.Subjects read a vignette concerning academic cheating, and were asked to respond to a question-naire concerning the vignette. Data were analyzed using structural equation methodology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00412815
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 68 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
69 ( #154,801 of 2,448,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes