Science and Education 22 (10):2529-2546 (2013)
Personalized genomics companies (PG; also called ‘direct-to-consumer genetics’) are businesses marketing genetic testing to consumers over the Internet. While much has been written about these new businesses, little attention has been given to their roles in science communication. This paper provides an analysis of the gene concept presented to customers and the relation between the information given and the science behind PG. Two quite different gene concepts are present in company rhetoric, but only one features in the science. To explain this, we must appreciate the delicate tension between PG, academic science, public expectation, and market forces
|Keywords||DTC Genetic Testing Personalized Genomics Internet Genetics Gene Concepts Public Understanding of Genetics Public Understanding of Biology Representations of Genetics Genetic Determinism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Concept of the Gene in Psychiatric Genetics and its Consequences for the Concept of Mental Illness.Vanessa Lux - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):65-77.
Gene Regulation, Quantitative Genetics and the Evolution of Reaction Norms.Carl Schlichting & Massimo Pigliucci - 1995 - Evolutionary Ecology 9:154-168.
How the Role of Computing is Driving New Genetics' Public Policy.Antonio Marturano & Ruth Chadwick - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):43-53.
The Gene Genie: Good Fairy or Wicked Witch?A. S. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):723-739.
Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts.Sharon L. R. Kardia, Jane P. Sheldon, Elizabeth M. Petty, Merle Feldbaum, Elizabeth S. Anderson, Angela D. Lanie & Toby Epstein Jayaratne - unknown
Genetic “Information” or the Indomitability of a Persisting Scientific Metaphor.Tareq Syed, Michael Bölker & Mathias Gutmann - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 5 (3-4):193-209.
The Morality of Human Gene Patents.David B. Resnik - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):43-61.
Alternative Definitions of Epistasis: Dependence and Interaction.Michael J. Wade, Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Aneil F. Agrawal & Charles J. Goodnight - 2001 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (9):498-504.
Gene Concepts and Genethics: Beyond Exceptionalism.Péter Kakuk - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):357-375.
Genes and Future People: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics.Walter Glannon - 2001 - Westview Press.
Added to index2012-07-19
Total downloads128 ( #36,841 of 2,158,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #23,333 of 2,158,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?