Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):5-21 (2011)
Almost everyone allows that conditions can obtain that exempt agents from moral responsibility—that someone is not a morally responsible agent if certain conditions obtain. In his seminal Freedom and Resentment, Peter Strawson denies that the truth of determinism globally exempts agents from moral responsibility. As has been noted elsewhere, Strawson appears committed to the surprising thesis that being an evil person is an exempting condition. Less often noted is the fact that various Strawsonians—philosophers sympathetic with Strawson’s account of moral responsibility—at least appear to have difficulty incorporating evil persons into their accounts of moral responsibility. In what follows, I argue that Strawson is not committed to supposing that being evil is an exempting condition—at least, that he can allow that evil persons are morally responsible agents
|Keywords||Strawson compatibilism semi-compatibilism evil|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath.R. J. R. Blair - 1995 - Cognition 57 (1):1-29.
Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism.Owen J. Flanagan - 1991 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Extremity of Vice and the Character of Evil.Peter Brian Barry - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Research 35:25-42.
The Price of Frankfurt's Compatibilism.Bindu Madhok - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes.Angus Ross - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.
On an Argument for the Impossibility of Moral Responsibility.Randolph Clarke - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):13-24.
Dispositional Accounts of Evil Personhood.Luke Russell - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):231 - 250.
Moral Responsibility: The Difference of Strawson, and the Difference It Should Make. [REVIEW]Andrew Sneddon - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):239-264.
The Limits of Evil and the Role of Moral Address: A Defense of Strawsonian Compatibilism. [REVIEW]Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - Journal of Ethics 2 (2):123-142.
Added to index2009-06-09
Total downloads138 ( #34,141 of 2,164,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,020 of 2,164,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?