The Saint Anselm Journal 14 (1):13-32 (2018)

Authors
Michael Barnwell
Niagara University
Abstract
Anselm is known for offering a distinctive definition of freedom of choice as “the ability of preserving uprightness of will for its own sake.” When we turn to Anselm’s account of the devil’s fall in De Casu Diaboli, however, this idiosyncratic understanding of freedom is not at the forefront. In that text, Anselm seemingly assumes a traditional understanding of free will defined in terms of alternative possibilities for the angels. These alternative possibilities must be present so the angels can engage in ‘self-determination.’ God, however, does not face alternative possibilities to achieve His self-determination. Anselm thus explicates his notion of free will in terms of three different concepts: his distinctive definition of free choice, self-determination, and the principle of alternative possibilities. Despite attempts (by both scholars and Anselm) to explain how these three concepts are related, I argue that their relationship is problematic. In particular, I argue that Anselm is guilty of conflating and equivocating with regard to these concepts. I further importantly claim that the conflation obscures the fact that his understanding of self-determination calls into question God’s excellence over that of the good angels.
Keywords Anselm  Devil  Free will  Self-determination  Fall  De Casu Diaboli  Will  Angels  Freedom  Sin
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anselm’s Account of Freedom.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):221-244.
Anselm on Freedom.Katherin Rogers - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Free Will and Determinism: The Anselmian Position.Stan R. Tyvoll - 1996 - Dissertation, Saint Louis University
Truth, Freedom, and Evil. Anselm - 1965 - New York: Harper & Row.
Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Thomas Williams - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Anselm’s Definition of Free Will: A Hierarchical Interpretation.Stan R. Tyvoll - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Anselm's Quiet Radicalism.Thomas Williams - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-16

Total views
113 ( #90,164 of 2,427,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #32,897 of 2,427,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes