Time deposits, dimensions, and fraud

Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):711-716 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We stipulate, arguendo, that fractional-reserve-demand deposit banking is per se fraudulent. We ask whether or not time deposit banking can also be illicit, and answer in the positive, if there is a mismatch between the time dimensions of deposits and loans. To wit, if an intermediary borrows short and lends long.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,037

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#251,273)

6 months
4 (#201,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Some ethical dilemmas of modern banking.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (3):235-245.
Some ethical dilemmas of modern banking.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (3):235-245.
The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):295-300.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references