Time deposits, dimensions, and fraud

Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):711-716 (2009)
Abstract
We stipulate, arguendo, that fractional-reserve-demand deposit banking is per se fraudulent. We ask whether or not time deposit banking can also be illicit, and answer in the positive, if there is a mismatch between the time dimensions of deposits and loans. To wit, if an intermediary borrows short and lends long.
Keywords Philosophy   Quality of Life Research   Management/Business for Professionals   Economic Growth   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9976-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):295-300.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

28 ( #175,736 of 2,146,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,104 of 2,146,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums