Synthese:1-17 (forthcoming)

Authors
Robert Barnard
University of Mississippi
Joseph Ulatowski
University of Waikato
Abstract
It is often claimed by theorists of truth that truth is objective. Upon reflection, however, this familiar principle can be understood in multiple ways. With this in mind, we have conducted empirical studies designed to elicit people’s responses to questions about the objectivity of truth. These studies suggest the following: (1) overall, individuals tend to endorse claims that are consistent with the objectivity of truth; (2) individuals’ conceptions of the objectivity of truth can be importantly different from one another; (3) philosophers and non-philosophers both endorse the objectivity of truth, but the apparent commitment of philosophers is stronger.
Keywords truth  objectivity  experimental philosophy  Arne Naess
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1605-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-01

Total views
235 ( #34,135 of 2,343,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,528 of 2,343,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes